Stryd Footpod – early review

Gear guru, Paul Day, is lucky enough to get his hands (and feet) on a bunch of run technology well ahead of the retail curve. We’re lucky enough to be able to get eyes on – and permission to publish – his insights, here investigating the latest (maybe greatest?) Stryd Footpod, where it’s all about measuring and reacting to your instant power output, more so than being dictated by your heart rate (which is kind of a horse has bolted indicator).


It’s not often that Australia gets something first! But somehow that’s exactly what’s happened with Stryd’s latest offering. After being a Kickstarter backer of the original Stryd Pioneer a year ago now, Stryd were kind enough to reward us all with early access to their second model – and mine arrived extra early.

With an intensive 48 hours of testing the new unit under my belt – and now being stuck on a plane for twenty hours – the guys at Stryd asked me if I was willing to share my thoughts and my initial impressions about this new unit. So armed with numerous cups of really bad airline coffee and a copy of Microsoft Paint, lets dive in!



The Stryd in its package

After reading the Stryd Forum and seeing another Australian user mentioned his unit had just arrived, I walked downstairs to have my 4-year-old son excitedly run up to me: “Dad! There’s a package for you!” Even after all these years, receiving a package in the mail is like getting a present on your birthday. And this present just happened to be the new Stryd.

With the assistance of an additional pair of eager hands, I pulled open the cardboard to get to reveal the new Stryd.

The design is quite unique and has more in common with an expensive piece of designer furniture than your average piece of sporting kit. The curved concentric lines of the unit continue into the packaging and onto the new wireless charger. The Stryd crew have clearly departed from the somewhat boxier look of the Stryd Pioneer of a year ago.

Stride with accessories

Stride with accessories

Inside the box is the foot pod unit itself, two shoe clips, the wireless charging base and a standard USB cable. The inclusion of two shoe clips is a nice touch. Stryd are obviously assuming (probably correctly!) that we’re all going to lose at least one shoe clip – so a second one is there at the ready.

The clip simply slots under your shoe laces, you then place the wider end of the unit into the clip and press down on the narrower end until it clicks into place. The clip seems quite secure and knocking it around with my hand I was unable to get the Stryd to pop out. To remove simply press down on the exposed section of the clip and lift the Stryd up.


Footpod in place

Unlike the Pioneer, the new Stryd is a completely sealed unit. You don’t need to replace the battery – instead charging it with the new wireless charger. I haven’t owned a piece of sporting tech that charges wirelessly before and I’m hoping Stryd’s lead here will become a trend. There’s no need to replace coin cells, you can easily ensure the unit’s 100% charged before a big race and you don’t need to physically plug a cable in to achieve that. Simply place the unit on the charging base every now and again to keep it topped up. Sounds simple, right? Well, about that…
It just looks… right – right?

Bzzzt – clearly my credentials as a self-appointed tech-savvy user are mis-placed. That or Stryd’s design team simply put far too much effort into the underside of the wireless charging base! I posted about my “faulty” charger on the Stryd Forum. Within a few minutes one of the guys at Stryd responded at 11pm his time asking me to jump on Skype to help trouble-shoot the issue. There aren’t many companies you’ll get that level of support from!


Ok, that worked

Fortunately, I realised my mistake before being embarrassed on a Skype call. To charge the unit you place it within the feint concentric lines on the flat-side of the base. The distinctive orange LED lights up as it starts charging. The cable is a normal USB plug that can go into any computer, USB hub or wall plug – or even a USB battery pack if you’re in a bind.

After only 48 hours of use I obviously can’t give you an estimate of real life battery usage.

Stryd in use

With the unit securely on my shoe, it was time to put it through its paces (pun intended!).

My training over the last two days has been:

  • AM: 30min upper body and core strength
  • PM: 30min short hill sprints with a 10min tempo run in the middle
  • AM: 120min long hill shuffles on trail
  • PM: 45min moderate run

I tested the unit out with a Suunto Ambit2, Ambit3 Peak and Spartan Ultra – along with the Stryd app on my Android phone. I also ran some side-by-side comparisons between the new Stryd and the Pioneer. For all your Garmin people out there, I’m afraid I’m going to disappoint. As a die-hard Suunto user, I don’t own a Garmin to test with (although if anyone wants to donate a Fenix3…). Finally, I also threw in one of the Dynastream foot pods that many companies rebadge to compare the pace and distance measurements supplied by the new Stryd.trm-web-banner


In true Stryd fashion, the unit has plenty of connectivity options to maximise its compatibility with as many devices as possible. If you have a smart kettle I’m pretty sure there’d be a way to hook the Stryd up to it to measure something.

The Stryd supports both ANT+ and BLE (Bluetooth Smart), sends power/cadence on the bike power profile and pace/distance/cadence on the foot pod profile. On my unit I did have an issue with cadence on the ANT+ profiles but given I was running the very first v1.0.0 firmware, one bug isn’t going to have me picketing the Stryd offices in protest and it will no doubt be addressed shortly. Cadence was fine on the BLE profiles, although like the Pioneer it’s in spm (steps per minute) rather than the rpm (revolutions per minute) that Suunto users will be used to.

Unlike the Pioneer, the new Stryd obviously doesn’t send heart-rate and the neat trick the Pioneer has of re-purposing cadence in the foot pod profile as power to really maximise compatibility options has been replaced with actual foot pod pace/distance/cadence measurements.

The BLE-compatible Suuntos (Ambit3 and Spartan) are currently only able to pair and connect to one profile on a device at a time. This means you need to choose either the power pod or the foot pod functionality – not both. Suunto dealt with this via a firmware update upon the Pioneer’s release by having the user pair it as a heart-rate pod and then the watch would silently connect to the bike power profile and take only power. I wouldn’t be surprised to see something similar appear with the new Stryd so you can use both the power pod and the foot pod functionality. The older Ambit2, which uses ANT+, has no problem connecting to both profiles at the same time.

I also updated and then paired the Stryd with the Stryd app running on my Android smartphone to set my weight and height on the unit. The app is available in both the iOS and Android app stores and requires you to register an account with Stryd. This step is necessary for the Stryd to calculate your absolute power rather than simply a comparative number. Unfortunately, I haven’t yet managed to re-do a Critical Power test with the new unit. I know – I was devastated. Who doesn’t love a run that leaves you feeling nauseous?!

Time for a run!

The first thing I noticed with the new Stryd is that it’s noticeably more responsive than the Pioneer. Given one of the selling points of running power is that it measures the physical load your body is under rather than waiting for your heart-rate to respond to that load, this increased responsiveness is definitely a positive.

I was only sync-ing the new Stryd to Stryd Powercenter via the app, so I’ll need to revert to Suunto Movescount to demonstrate the increased responsiveness compared to the Pioneer. I did my short hill repeats session with the new Stryd sending power to my Ambit2 and the Pioneer sending to my Spartan. The two graphs below show power vs time of one of those repeats. They start with the slow downhill recovery jog of the previous repeat, turning around, immediately starting to sprint and then the start of the next downhill.

mc-shorthills-pioneerPower from the Pioneer on a short hill repeat

mc-shorthills-footpodPower from the Stryd on a short hill repeat

You can see the new Stryd is clearly more responsive as I turned around and started sprinting. On average, it responded in approximately 66% of the time the Pioneer took to respond.

You’ll notice I haven’t yet calibrated my Pioneer – hence a difference in the raw power and the average that’s drawn as dotted horizontal line. Apparently wearing the Pioneer in different positions can impact the power calculation and Stryd have recently included a feature in the smartphone app to calibrate the unit. Without calibration for your preferred position the numbers are still perfectly useable as a comparative measure, but – like setting your weight – may not be absolute. Check out this email for the full details.

The Wind

The other improvement I noticed was the new Stryd’s response to wind.

Both units have a barometric air pressure sensor in them to help measure ascent and descent to help with power calculations. A drop in air pressure means you’re going up – an increase means you’re going down. Unfortunately, wind hitting my chest also creates a pressure increase on the Pioneer’s sensor, fooling it into thinking I’m now running downhill and artificially dropping my displayed power. The new Stryd is still impacted by strong winds, but the impact is noticeably less. Turning a corner on my 45min moderate run and hitting a fresh breeze I noticed the power drop on the new Stryd was generally about 30-50% of that on the Pioneer. Likewise, when the wind dropped off the rebound increase in power was noticeably less on the new Stryd. And yes, I got a few strange looks from passers-by as I ran along with both elbows sticking out with my eyes glued to the two watches held up in front of me!

Stryd App and Powercenter

As with the Pioneer, your run data can be loaded directly into the Powercenter web app via the smartphone app or via your watch of choice (including Garmin Connect and Suunto Movescount). Using a GPS watch or recording your run with the app (which obviously requires running with your phone) adds the benefit of a GPS track.

stryd_app stryd_app_summary

Above: Stryd app – mid-run and summary

Sync-ing with Movescount I was able to pull the power details across from my 45min moderate run into Powercenter. I then sync-ed the Stryd via the app which automatically combined the two sources of data and added in the Stryd-only metrics of Vertical Oscillation (VO) and Ground Contact Time (GCT). VO and GCT from the Stryd aren’t currently recorded by any watches on the market (although the Garmin HRM-Run pod does generate the same metrics for Garmin users).

pc-45min_mod-footpodStryd Powercenter with power, GCT and VO displayed

Users of both the Stryd Pioneer and Garmin HRM-Run will be familiar with these two metrics which, along with cadence, are useful for measuring your running form. A high vertical oscillation suggests you’re bobbing up and down too much, wasting energy in vertical movement rather than putting it into horizontal. Along with cadence, these metrics can also be useful in determining where you’re fatiguing and losing your form later in an endurance run. Comparing Tuesday’s run when fresh with the second half of Wednesday’s second run, I was able to see clear signs of fatigue and a drop in form.

The new Stryd goes one step further and adds an additional metric in the form of leg spring (or stiffness), measured in kN/m. I was only able to see this metric by recording my run using the Stryd app – sync-ing the Stryd via the app after a run didn’t generate it. I wouldn’t be surprised to see this updated in a coming firmware/app release as the Stryd crew are pretty good about presenting us with every possible option.


Stryd PowerCenter with power and leg spring showing

So, what’s leg spring and what use is it I hear you ask? Sorry, but I don’t have an answer for you yet! I ran out of time to really research this new metric and work out how it can be useful. The collaboration that occurs on the Stryd Forum is a great asset and I wouldn’t be surprised to start seeing discussion and different uses around this new metric shortly.

As a foot pod

A side effect of what is essential a set of very smart accelerometers attached to your foot is that the Stryd is measuring your foot’s movement in 3-dimensional space. This in turn allows it to measure your speed/pace, distance and cadence and present them to you via the standard ANT+ and BLE foot pod profiles.

But foot pods are those clunky things we used to stick on our running shoes back before GPS watches became available, right? Well, not entirely. I often do my 13km run home from work as a snowball – increasing it by 5s/km every 1km until my final km is at a pace I can barely maintain. Good times! However, my run home takes me under numerous bridges, underpasses and hangs under a freeway for a good portion. Even the Suunto Ambit3’s GPS struggles to give me accurate pace when there’s a foot of steel and concrete above it.

Enter the foot pod. Calibrated properly, it will beat my GPS watch when it comes to accurate pace in challenging GPS environments.

But the new Stryd seems to take the foot pod’s accuracy to a whole new level. It doesn’t require any calibration to give very stable pace and accurate distance measurement. My testing obviously wasn’t exhaustive, but on a flat road run I found the accuracy and stability of pace data was clearly best from the Stryd, followed by my calibrated Dynastream, the Suunto Ambit3 and finally the uncalibrated Dynastream.

But the other exciting thought is that this provides accurate measurements off-road. The Dynastream’s accuracy tends to fall away once you get outside the running conditions you calibrated it in and fall even further when you take it onto the trail. The Stryd shows a lot more potential off trail. Accurate pace is generally of limited use for trail running, but one application would be for 100km+ events where your GPS watch battery may not last the distance: turn the GPS accuracy down to make the battery last the distance while still recording a semi-accurate track, but continue getting accurate distance measurements by using the Stryd.

Unfortunately, I didn’t get enough time to truly test the accuracy of the Stryd’s distance measurements on trail. Check out the Stryd Forum where I’ll share the results of testing at a race in a couple of days’ time – and other users have already planned to share their own testing.


Despite the length this “initial impressions” review has turned into (thank you aircraft coffee!) I definitely feel I’ve only briefly touched on everything the new Stryd has to offer. So far it looks like the crew at Stryd have taken their learnings from the ground-breaking Pioneer device and improved on them further with the release of the new foot pod design. And no doubt we’ll continue to see improvements in the form of firmware and software updates.

Join Paul on the Stryd Forum or in the Stryd Facebook group where he and many other enthusiastic Stryd users and the staff at Stryd happily hang around sharing thoughts and answering questions.

Check out TRM’s trail test of the new Suunto Spartan: 

Suunto Sartan

Screenshot 2016-08-30 11.11.35

Gear Review: Stryd run power meter

Stryd is “the world’s first power meter for running”. But what the hell does that mean and why do we care? REVIEW: Tegyn Angel, Co-editor.  

Power Meters have been at the top of every cyclist’s wish list for years; a perfect albeit tool to measure output in training and racing in a way that is independent of variables like fatigue, weather or inclination.  Whereas a typical bio-feedback tool like a Heart Rate Monitor (HRM) measures your body’s response to training, a Power Meter measures the actual output of your effort Watts.  On a bike it’s easy to calibrate your meter using known gear ratios and the like, but until Stryd no one had come up with a way to measure running Power outside of the lab.Screenshot 2016-05-05 21.46.48

The Stryd unit itself is like a slightly larger version of a HRM pod and is slightly smaller than a match box.  This clips on to a strap that incorporates Heart Rate sensors and is worn around the chest like a traditional HRM.  The placement is a little frustrating (especially given pre-release models clipped onto your shorts like a pedometer) but is presumably it’s to ensure that the measurement is made at the centre of body mass and isn’t influenced by the excessive movement of your arms, legs or hips. Paired to your watch (in our case a Suunto Ambit3 Vertical) or phone, Stryd replaces your standard HRM and now provides a realtime feed of Heart Rate AND Power data.

BRILLIANT! Now what…? Well, we’re still trying to work that out.  We have a metric, a unit of measurement, but people are still trying to establish exactly HOW to use the information.  This is cutting edge, early adopter stuff, so let’s start with what the marketing boffins at Stryd have to say about it, then we’ll give you our thoughts.Mt Buller

If you head over to the first thing you’ll see is a pretty video (with some lovely Suunto cameo) which suggests that, paired with the phone App, Stryd can actively coach you toward a more efficient running technique.  How? Think of it as a process of eliminating variables.  Let’s say I’m running at 5:00 minutes per kilometre on a flat track.  On my first lap I’m generating 300w and on the second this pushes out to 330w.  What’s changed? My pace is the same and no other environmental variables are influencing things, so therefore it comes down to a matter of efficiency.  The coach in my ear (via earphones from my phone) tells me to relax and focus on increasing my cadence.  Very cool!  12309763_494114670772590_4755187599445766202_o

In another example I’m aiming to keep a consistent effort through my run or race but I hit a steep hill and am reduced to a fast hike.  My pace plummets and I push harder to try and bring it back up.  My breathing quickens and I start to feel my pulse thumping in my forehead.  A quick glance at my watch and I see that, while I’d been keeping a consistent 270w along the undulating low lands, my effort has now jumped to 340w and I’m approaching redline.  I know intuitively, and now have an objective way of confirming, that I need to back off or I’ll bonk.

This all sounds great, but also a little gimmicky for the Average Joe.  Unless you’re looking for those One Percenters, this onslaught of additional metrics might seem a little overwhelming.  Surely I can work these things out on my own and just “run to feel”? Isn’t this just a glorified pedometer for the data obsessed Triathlete? I’m a Trail Runner, I don’t need it!  Time will tell if that’s the case, but hold up a minute, let’s have a look at how we Mud Junkies might get some benefit from it.

Scenario 1: I have a tendency to over train, particularly when I introduce speed work.  I feel good for a week or two and start to feel my body adapting, then I get the Man Flu.  Theoretically, Stryd provides a tool to help identify Overtraining Syndrome before it gets too bad.  Heart Rate has traditionally been used in this capacity, a technique that was popularised by Endurance Guru Dr Phil Maffetone.  His advice was to keep a log of your training and match your pace to your average HR.  Let’s say on the first week of February you ran your favourite 5km loop in 25 minutes (5:00min/km) and maintained a Heart Rate of 150bpm.  In the third week of February you head out again and this time the same loop, at an average HR of 150bpm, takes you 27:30 (5:30min/km).  One explanation for the decrease in pace, in spite of a stable pace and theoretically two weeks of improved fitness, is that your body is overstressed in one way or another.  This is an awesome tool, but while HR is largely subjective, Power is Objective.  I’ll admit I’m a little unsure of this given that training is about  stimulating Subjective Adaptation, but it certainly sounds good on paper.12363232_496484017202322_4608237416806898762_o

Scenario 2: I love running downhill and so does my girlfriend.  However, whereas I can drop her like it’s hot once the angle gets life threatening, she leaves me in the dust when the hill is “runnable”.  I feel clunky and slow, inefficient and genuinely amateur compared to the way she glides down the hill.  Using Stryd I can play around with different technique adjustments until I reach a point where the Watts displayed on watch are as low as possible. Shorten my stride, increase the height of my heel kick, swing my arms differently, tense my hammies, keep my knees bent, point my toes, adjust my breathing.  Because Stryd displays power in real time, without HR lag, I can now be my own technique coach and learn what makes my running more efficient.

Is Stryd the next big thing in Running?  Probably not, but then decent GPS watches have only been around for about 10 years and Suunto didn’t release the Ambit 1 until early 2012 and yet now you’ll hardly find a trail runner without one. There’s no question that Stryd is revolutionary.  However, all revolutions create an environment of confusion and uncertainty.  Just as it takes time for people to learn what to do with their new found freedom and responsibility, it will take time for coaches and amateurs alike to learn the best way to train with Stryd. 

Fortunately the folks behind Stryd have embraced this fact and their forum has become a thriving community of interested people actively contributing to the development and application of the device.  More to the point, they seem to be listening to what people have to say!


Screenshot 2016-04-11 21.50.21